Extending Propositional Logic with Concrete Domains in Multi-issue Bilateral Negotiation
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a novel approach to knowledge-based automated one-shot multi-issue bilateral negotiation handling, in a homogeneous setting, both numerical features and non-numerical ones. The framework makes possible to formally represent typical situations in real e-marketplaces such as “if I spend more than 20000 e for a sedan then I want a navigator pack included” where both numerical (price) and non-numerical (sedan, navigator pack) issues coexist. To this aim we introduce P(N ), a propositional logic extended with concrete domains, which allows to: model relations among issues (both numerical and not numerical ones) via logical entailment, differently from well-known approaches that describe issues as uncorrelated; represent buyer’s request, seller’s supply and their respective preferences as formulas endowed with a formal semantics. By modeling preferences as formulas it is hence possible to assign a utility value also to a bundle of issues, which is obviously more realistic than the trivial sum of utilities assigned to single elements in the bundle itself. We illustrate the theoretical framework, the logical language, the one-shot negotiation protocol we adopt, and show we are able to compute Pareto-efficient outcomes, using a mediator to solve a multi objective optimization problem.
منابع مشابه
Extending Propositional Logic with Concrete Domains for Multi-issue Bilateral Negotiation
We present a novel approach to knowledge-based automated one-shot multi-issue bilateral negotiation handling, in a homogeneous setting, both numerical features and non-numerical ones. The framework makes possible to formally represent typical situations in real e-marketplaces such as “if I spend more than 20000 e for a sedan then I want a navigator pack included” where both numerical (price) an...
متن کاملTowards a Fuzzy Logic for Automated Multi-issue Negotiation
We present a novel logic-based approach to automate multi-issue bilateral negotiation in e-marketplaces. In such frameworks issues to negotiate on can be multiple, interrelated, and may not be fixed in advance. We use logic to model relations among issues and to allow agents express their preferences on them. In particular, we introduce the logic P(N ), a fuzzy propositional logic extended with...
متن کاملA Logic-Based Framework to Compute Pareto Agreements in One-Shot Bilateral Negotiation
We propose a logic-based approach to automated oneshot multi-issue bilateral negotiation. We use logic in two ways: (1) a logic theory to represent relations among issues – e.g., logical implication – in contrast with approaches that describe issues as uncorrelated with each other; (2) utilities over formulas to represent agents having preferences over different bundles of issues. In this case,...
متن کاملDescription Logics for Multi-Issue Bilateral Negotiation with Incomplete Information
We propose a framework for multi-issue bilateral negotiation, where issues are expressed and related to each other via Description Logics. Agents’ goals are expressed through (complex) concepts, and the worth of goals as weights over concepts. We adopt a very general setting with incomplete information by letting agents keep both goals and worths of goals as private information. We introduce a ...
متن کاملAlternating-Offers Protocol for Multi-issue Bilateral Negotiation in Semantic-Enabled Marketplaces
We present a semantic-based approach to multi-issue bilateral negotiation for e-commerce. We use Description Logics to model advertisements, and relations among issues as axioms in a TBox. We then introduce a logic-based alternating-offers protocol, able to handle conflicting information, that merges non-standard reasoning services in Description Logics with utility thoery to find the most suit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007